Pet Food Safety

Contaminants in Pet Food

Pet parents assume that commercial dog and cat foods are produced under the same safeguards that protect the human food supply. After all, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act makes no legal distinction between human and animal food. Both must be safe, both must come from acceptable sources, and both must meet the standards of identity, composition, and labeling laid out in federal law.

In practice, however, decades of regulatory “guidance,” policy shifts, enforcement discretion, and industry-driven definitions have created a big gap between what the law requires and what is allowed.

Many ingredients that would never be permitted in human food appear in the AAFCO Official Publication, primarily in the animal-feed section. These ingredients are used for livestock, poultry, and aquaculture—not pets. Even so, the broader feed supply chain matters. What food animals consume becomes incorporated into their tissues. The contaminants in those tissues can then move up the food chain—to pets and to humans.

This article highlights three significant contaminants and exposure routes identified in published research, intrepid journalism, and dedicated animal activism.

Direct Contaminants: Heavy Metals, Environmental Toxins, and Industrial Waste

Many contaminants enter pet food from multiple directions: polluted soil and waters, industrial processes, ingredient adulteration, and even legally sanctioned waste-stream recycling. While the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act technically prohibits foods made from adulterated materials, FDA’s own policy has long tolerated certain ingredients as long as they do not pose an “imminent hazard.”

Not long ago, consumers caught on to the “guidance policies” that allow truly disgusting ingredients to enter animal feed as long as their processing includes a “kill step.” For pet food, that step is typically rendering, a long cooking process that kills the most pathogenic bacteria. In response, the FDA removed these documents from their website. They did not discontinue the policies, they just hid them from the public.

Heavy metals and trace elements

Toxic heavy metals such as lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium have been documented in pet food ingredients and finished commercial diets. These contaminants may originate in fish-based ingredients, mineral supplements, or in crops grown in contaminated soils. Heavy metals are persistent, so even low levels pose cumulative, lifelong risks—especially for small animals with high metabolic rates.

A study examining toxic elements in commercial pet foods found detectable—and in some cases, concerning—levels of several metals. While the study focused on dog foods, the exposure pathways are similar across species. Pets consuming the same diet daily for years may accumulate contaminants far more consistently than humans with varied diets.

Agro-chemicals: They don’t wash off

Lurking quietly in the pet-food supply chain are thousands of agro-chemicals—pesticides, herbicides, desiccants, and other residues—that move unseen from field to feed to bowl.

Herbicides such as glyphosate are ubiquitous in crop production, GMO (genetically-engineered) corn, soybeans, and cottonseed (the oil is often used in pet foods) contain high levels. Glyphosate is incorporated into the very cells of the plant; it can’t be washed off.

Glyphosate is also sprayed on many non-GMO crops to dry them for easy harvest. Dogs and cats are directly eating the oats, rice, apples, blueberries, flax, lentils, and potatoes that have been directly sprayed with this toxin.

What pet parents may not realize is that these residues can enter the companion-animal food chain via plant ingredients or via the tissues of food animals that consumed contaminated crops.

Industrial and municipal waste residues

One of the least understood but most important contributors to contaminant exposure comes from waste-stream recycling within agriculture. Sewage sludge (biosolids) has been used for decades as a fertilizer on croplands. Although this practice is regulated, biosolids may contain metals, PFAS compounds (“forever chemicals”), pharmaceuticals, flame retardants, nuclear waste, and other persistent pollutants. Crops grown on these fields become feed for livestock, whose tissues become ingredients in both human and pet food.

This problem is not speculative. It is well documented. What begins in soil and wastewater can move into crops, then into animals, and finally into pet food ingredients.

Toxic sludge and animal feed allowances

The FDA’s enforcement policies allow certain materials unsuitable for human consumption to be diverted into animal feed, provided they do not pose an immediate health hazard. Over the years, this has included condemned animal tissues, adulterated grains contaminated with chemical residues, and fats containing elevated levels of peroxides. When these materials enter livestock feed, they influence the quality of the resulting meat and fat products that later become ingredients in pet food. Sustainability requires examining not only what goes into pet food, but what goes into the animals whose tissues supply its ingredients.

Processing contaminants: Advanced Glycation End-Products (AGEs)

AGEs are formed when proteins, sugars, and fats are exposed to high temperatures. Commercial kibbles and canned foods undergo repeated heat processing—rendering, extrusion, retorting—which produces AGEs in substantial quantities. These compounds are associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, renal strain, and accelerated aging in multiple species. Cats are especially vulnerable due to their low natural thirst drive and the chronic kidney stress associated with dry diets; however, AGEs affect dogs as well. Reducing AGEs is central to both sustainability and animal health, since lower-temperature processing, fresh foods, and moisture-rich diets generally produce fewer of these compounds.

Microbial Contamination and Spoilage Hazards

Although pet foods undergo heating steps intended to control pathogens, contamination can occur at many stages: ingredient transport, storage, handling, mixing, or post-processing. Dry foods in particular are vulnerable because their low moisture allows certain organisms to survive for long periods.

Salmonella, Listeria, and other pathogens

A number of studies have documented pathogenic bacteria in commercial dog and cat foods, both raw and processed, including Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria species. While healthy adult pets may not always become clinically ill, they can become carriers, shedding pathogens into the home environment. This risk is elevated in households with young children, seniors, or immunocompromised individuals. Moist foods and treats, especially those containing rendered animal products, may also serve as reservoirs for microbial hazards when quality control practices fail.

There is another problem with many pathogenic bacteria: they produce their own toxins. These toxins are released from the bacteria as they die. The high-heat kill step does nothing to break down these toxins.

Some bacteria are also spore-formers. Spores are extremely hardy and are not affected by heat or freezing. They’re still sleeping in the pet food as it is stacked on pet store shelves.

Fungal toxins and mycotoxins

Mycotoxins, including aflatoxins, ochratoxins, and fumonisins, are produced by fungi that infect crops such as corn, wheat, and soybeans. Moldy grains are condemned for human consumption, but where do they go? Right into animal feed. The kill step destroys the fungi themselves, but not the mycotoxins. Several fatal dog-food recalls have been traced to aflatoxin contamination that leads to liver failure. More than 100 died from consuming these foods. Mycotoxins are powerful carcinogens; it is unknown how many dogs develop cancer from non-lethal levels.

Mycotoxin testing is required for human foods but not for pet food. Non-grain ingredients have lower mycotoxin risks; poor storage conditions and bulk commodity sourcing create higher ones.

Nutrient-Based Failures, Supplier Errors, and Misformulation

Not all contamination involves foreign chemicals or microbes. Sometimes the problem lies in mistaken formulations, inadequate nutrient supplementation, or supplier errors upstream of the pet food manufacturer. These incidents highlight systemic vulnerabilities in ingredient sourcing and quality control.

Vitamin D excesses and deficiencies

Vitamin D recalls have occurred repeatedly in pet foods when incorrect premixes were added or when agricultural by-products (such as certain fish oils or protein meals) contained unexpectedly high levels of vitamin D analogues. Excessive vitamin D can cause kidney damage, hypercalcemia, and death. Deficiencies, though less common, also pose significant risks. Cats fed diets lacking sufficient vitamin D may develop bone and metabolic diseases.

Thiamine (Vitamin B1) deficiencies

Thiamine is essential for neurological function, and deficiencies can emerge when heat processing destroys natural thiamine in meats or when premixes are incorrectly formulated. One case involved a super-premium canned diet that killed dozens of kittens and cats. Thiamine is easily destroyed by heat processing, and manufacturers have not always compensated effectively.

Label discrepancies and undeclared ingredients

Many analyses of commercial pet foods have revealed mismatches between label claims and actual ingredients present. Some discrepancies may stem from inadvertent cross-contamination at pet food plants. But others appear to be much more than careless, even deliberate. A popular dog treat, for example, claimed to contain bacon and beef; DNA testing found only chicken. Sustainable, transparent nutrition requires both accurate labeling and robust supplier verification practices. However, no one is interested in fixing this issue: not suppliers, not pet food manufacturers, not even regulators. And it is only getting worse with every new study published.

Why Contaminants Matter in a Sustainability Framework

Contaminants in pet foods are not isolated problems; they are indicators of systemic weaknesses in agricultural, industrial, and regulatory practices. A sustainable approach must address:

• Ingredient sourcing: including the feed given to food animals.

• Environmental pathways: what enters soil, water, crops, and livestock.

• Manufacturing practices: processing temperatures, storage conditions, and sanitation.

• Regulatory transparency: clear, science-based policies that apply equally across feed and food categories.

Reducing contaminants is aligned with environmental stewardship. Cleaner agricultural practices, better waste management, and safer ingredient sourcing benefit pets, wildlife, and humans alike.

What Pet Parents Can Do

• Rotate protein sources and brands to reduce cumulative exposure to any single contaminant.

• Use moisture-rich diets when possible to support kidney health, especially in cats.

• Stay informed about recalls and independent testing. (Sign up for Food Safety News, an independent recall tracker.)

• Advocate for improved standards through consumer g and groups and organizations like the Pet Sustainability Project.

References

Anderson ES. Drug resistance in Salmonella typhimurium and its implications. ­British Medical Journal. 1968 Aug 10; 3(5614): 333–339.

Andersson A, Ronner U, Granum PE. What problems does the food industry have with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens? International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1995 Dec;28(2):145-55.

Atkins P, Ernyei L, Driscoll W, et al. Analysis of toxic trace metals in pet foods using cryogenic grinding and quantitation by ICP-MS, Part I. Spectroscopy. 2011 Jan;26(1):46-56.

Atkins P, Ernyei L, Driscoll W, et al. Analysis of toxic trace metals in pet foods using cryogenic grinding and quantitation by ICP-MS, Part II. Spectroscopy. 2011 Feb;26(2):42-59.

Bennett J, Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clinical Microbiology Review. 2003;16: 497–516.

CAST (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology). Mycotoxins: Economic and Health Risks. 1989. Ames, Iowa. Vol. IA, p. 116.

Buss P, Caviezel M, Lutz WK. Linear dose-response relationship for DNA adducts in rat liver from chronic exposure to aflatoxin B1. Carcinogenesis. 1990; 11(12):2133-2135.

Cinquepalmi V, Monno R, Fumarola L, et al. Environmental Contamination by Dog’s Faeces: A Public Health Problem? International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health. 2013 Jan; 10(1): 72–84.

Claire E, Mesnage R, Travert C, et al. A glyphosate-based herbicide induces necrosis and apoptosis in mature rat testicular cells in vitro, and testosterone decrease at lower levels. Toxicology in Vitro. 2012 Mar;26(2):269-279.

Conway D. 2015. Unpublished data.

Cort N, Fredriksson G, Kindahl H, et al. Clinical and Endocrine Study on the Effect of Orally Administered Bacterial Endotoxin in Adult Pigs and Goats. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 1990. A 37:130-137.

Crump JA, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ. Bacterial contamination of animal feed and its relationship to human foodborne illness. Clinical Infectious Disease. 2002 Oct 1;35(7):859-65.

Cullor J. University of California at Davis, Veterinary Medical Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA. Unpublished data and personal communication, 1999-2000.

Davis MA, Hancock DD, Rice DH, et al. Feedstuffs as a vehicle of cattle exposure to Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica. Veterinary Microbiology. 2003 Sep 1;95(3):199-210.

Duff Wilson. “Fear in the Fields.” Seattle Times Investigative Series, 1997.

FDA/CVM Report on the risk from pentobarbital in dog food. 2002 Feb. 28. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofFoods/CVM/CVMFOIAElectronicReadingRoom/ucm129131.htm

FDA 2011. Target Animal Safety Review Memorandum. 2011 June 15. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/centersoffices/officeoffoods/cvm/cvmfoiaelectronicreadingroom/ucm274327.pdf

FDA 2015. Arsenic-based Animal Drugs and Poultry. 2015 April 24. http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/ProductSafetyInformation/ucm257540.htm

Fernández-González R, Yebra-Pimentela I, Martínez-Carballoa E, et al. A Critical Review about Human Exposure to Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins (PCDDs), Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) through Foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2015;55(11).

Fossati LA, Larsen JA, Villaverde C, Fascetti AJ. Determination of mammalian DNA in commercial canine diets with uncommon and limited ingredients. Veterinary Medicine and Science. 2019 Feb;5(1):30-38.

Franke-Whittle IH, Insam H. Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their ­effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: a review. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2013; 39(2): 139–151.

Fries G. A review of the significance of animal food products and potential pathways of human exposures to dioxins. Journal of Animal Science. 1995; 73:1639-1650

Grisamore SB, Hile JP, Otten RJ. Pesticide residues on grain products. Cereal Foods World. 1991;36:434-37.

Hussein HS, Brasel JM. Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology. 2001 Oct 15;167(2):101-34.

Karthikraj R, Borkar S, Lee S, et al. Parabens and Their Metabolites in Pet Food and Urine from New York State, United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 20;52(6):3727-3737.

Mansour SA. Chemical pollutants threatening food safety and security: an overview. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. 2011 Mar 9:73-117.

Markus CK, Chow LH, Wycoff DM, et al. Pet food-derived penicillin residue as a potential cause of hypersensitivity myocarditis and sudden death, American Journal of Cardiology. 1989 May 1;63:1154-1156.

Milićević DR, Škrinjar M, Baltić T. Real and Perceived Risks for Mycotoxin Contamination in Foods and Feeds: Challenges for Food Safety Control. Toxins. 2010;2: 572-592.

Okuma TA, Hellberg RS. Identification of meat species in pet foods using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Food Contro. 2015; 50:9-17.

Pestka JJ. Fungal toxins in raw and fermented meats, In: Fermented Meats; Campbell-Platt G, Cook PE, Eds. 1995. Blackie Academic and Professional: Glasgow, UK, pp. 194–216.

Preckel L, Brünen-Nieweler C, Denay G, Petersen H, Cichna-Markl M, Dobrovolny S, Hochegger R. Identification of Mammalian and Poultry Species in Food and Pet Food Samples Using 16S rDNA Metabarcoding. Foods. 2021 Nov 20;10(11):2875.

Samsel A, Seneff S. Glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: pathways to modern diseases. Entropy. 2013;15:1416-1463.

Sapkota AR, Lefferts LY, McKenzie S, et al. What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007;115:663–670.

Seiffert SN, Carattoli A, Tinguely R, et al. High Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum-Lactamase, Plasmid-Mediated AmpC, and Carbapenemase Genes in Pet Food. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2014 Oct; 58(1):6320–6323.

Srogi K. Levels and congener distributions of PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs in environmental and human samples: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2008; 6:1–28.

Strombeck DJ. 2010. Home-prepared diets for dogs and cats. http://www.dogcathomeprepareddiet.com

van Rooijen C, Bosch G, van der Poel AFB, et al. Quantitation of Maillard reaction products in commercially available pet foods. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 2014;62:8883-8891.

Wilson D. Fear in the fields: how hazardous wastes become fertilizer. Seattle Times. 1997 July 3.

Zain ME. Impact of mycotoxins on human and animals. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2011;15: 129-144.

Zafalon RVA, Pedreira RS, Vendramini THA, et al. Toxic element levels in ingredients and commercial pet foods. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:21007.

Feature 2

Suspendisse nec congue purus. Vivamus sit amet semper lacus, in mollis libero.

Feature 3

Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Vivamus a ante congue, porta nunc nec, hendrerit turpis.